Return to Question

Surviving fragments of the many lost works of Aristotle were included in the fifth volume of Bekker's edition, edited by Valentin Rose. These are not cited by Bekker numbers, however, but according to fragment numbers. Rose's first edition of the fragments of Aristotle was Aristoteles Pseudepigraphus (1863). As the title suggests, Rose considered these all to be spurious. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_of_Aristotle#:~:text=According%20to%20Strabo%20and%20Plutarch,went%20to%20Neleus%20of%20Scepsis.

Aristotle's lecture notes are as important to modern philosophy as the Bible to Christians. But in both cases, from a philosophical point of qualification, can we say it is TRUTH or NOT TRUTH? Do we have philosophical qualities like UNDETERMINED?

Surviving fragments of the many lost works of Aristotle were included in the fifth volume of Bekker's edition, edited by Valentin Rose. These are not cited by Bekker numbers, however, but according to fragment numbers. Rose's first edition of the fragments of Aristotle was Aristoteles Pseudepigraphus (1863). As the title suggests, Rose considered these all to be spurious. (source: Wikipedia).

Aristotle's lecture notes are as important to modern philosophy as the Bible to Christians. But in both cases, from a philosophical point of qualification, can we say it is TRUTH or NOT TRUTH? Do we have philosophical qualities like UNDETERMINED?

Surviving fragments of the many lost works of Aristotle were included in the fifth volume of Bekker's edition, edited by Valentin Rose. These are not cited by Bekker numbers, however, but according to fragment numbers. Rose's first edition of the fragments of Aristotle was Aristoteles Pseudepigraphus (1863). As the title suggests, Rose considered these all to be spurious. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_of_Aristotle#:~:text=According%20to%20Strabo%20and%20Plutarch,went%20to%20Neleus%20of%20Scepsis.

Aristotle's lecture notes are as important to modern philosophy as the Bible to Christians. But in both cases, from a philosophical point of qualification, can we say it is TRUTH or NOT TRUTH? Do we have philosophical qualities like UNDERMINED?

Surviving fragments of the many lost works of Aristotle were included in the fifth volume of Bekker's edition, edited by Valentin Rose. These are not cited by Bekker numbers, however, but according to fragment numbers. Rose's first edition of the fragments of Aristotle was Aristoteles Pseudepigraphus (1863). As the title suggests, Rose considered these all to be spurious. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_of_Aristotle#:~:text=According%20to%20Strabo%20and%20Plutarch,went%20to%20Neleus%20of%20Scepsis.

Aristotle's lecture notes are as important to modern philosophy as the Bible to Christians. But in both cases, from a philosophical point of qualification, can we say it is TRUTH or NOT TRUTH? Do we have philosophical qualities like UNDETERMINED?