There is of course predicate as in predicate logic; but I'm asking about the notion in Aristotle's Organon.

Consider the proposition:

Socrates is a man.

Man is a universal, Socrates is a particular; and Man is predicated of Socrates. Is this the only sense in which Aristotle means by the term predicate?

  • Of course, in A it is discussed also the possibility of a "more general" universal predicated of another universal : "Piety is a virtue". See e.g. Kwame Gyekye, Aristotle and a modern notion of predication (1974). – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Apr 25 '15 at 20:22
  • Re the close vote -- if we rule out this specific a question on the intended interpretation of this important a philosopher, what on earth is the topic? – jobermark Apr 26 '15 at 18:46
  • The "Organon" is an editorial artefact, not something Aristotle conceived, so the point of the Q is not really clear. And 'predicate' might be the accepted substitute for a Greek word that Aristotle used but in the original text things look/sound rather differently. – sand1 May 16 at 21:57

The Organon by Aristotle is a set of six books. Here is an example of the use of "predicate" in Categories v (page 29)

The species is predicated of all individual examples, the genus of these and the species....For all we affirm of the predicate will also be affirmed of the subject.

In a footnote in the Prior Analytics, I. iv, the translator, Hugh Tredennick, remarks, "the predicate is naturally a more comprehensive notion than the subject".

The predicate applies or does not apply to the subject.

Regarding the sentence, "Socrates is a man", Henrik Lagerlund remarks that the use of the verb "is" originates with Boethius:

Boethius made no substantial contribution to the theory of the syllogism, though he was an important transmitter of the theory to later logicians and his works offer a clear presentation of the Aristotelian account. But that presentation differs from Aristotle's in one important respect. In Boethius, the categorical sentences are constructed using ‘is’ (’est’) and not ‘belongs’, as in Aristotle.

Aristotle. The Categories On Interpretation Prior Analytics. Loeb Classical Library. 1962. Retrieved on May 16, 2019 from Internet Archive at https://archive.org/details/L325AristotleIPriorAnalytics/page/n5

Lagerlund, Henrik, "Medieval Theories of the Syllogism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/medieval-syllogism/.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.