Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with bayesian
Search options not deleted
user 48028
Bayesian reasoning is a probabilistic approach to inductive and abductive reasoning, based on Bayes' rule, that posits when one event implies a second event is likely, that given the second event occurring, that increases the likelihood of the first event.
3
votes
2
answers
541
views
Logical Interpretations of Probability
This does seem to be genuinely epistemic, but it's not clear how it differs from the Bayesian interpretation of probability, aside from not explicitly referencing Bayes' Theorem as the decider of rational … How does the logical interpretation of probability stand as its own epistemic interpretation, rather than being partly objective and partly subsumed into the Bayesian interpretation? …
- 33