Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with quantum-interpretations
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 8761
This tag is for questions relating to what, if anything, the quantum mechanical formalism and experimental results say about the way the world works.
2
votes
Accepted
How can theory violate counterfactual definiteness and not violate local realism?
In the context of quantum mechanics, the violation of counterfactual definiteness (CFD) means that the laws of standard logic, or standard probability calculus, will be violated if you consider other …
- 5,968
5
votes
Is the delayed choice quantum eraser a refutation of principle of causality? How does contem...
Delayed choices undermines past to future causality only if one assumes that the initial state of a system must directly determine measurement results, and that wave functions represent our ignorance …
- 5,968
2
votes
Many-worlds Interpretation defeats the Doomsday argument?
That's an interesting argument, but it seems that you're merely resisting the idea of calculating p(N|n) on the ground that p(n|N) would not make sense if there are many futures. However you should be …
- 5,968
5
votes
How can we take the ontologies of our best physical theories seriously?
For a rather technical book in philosophy of quantum mechanics and QFT you can read Laura Ruetsche "interpreting quantum theories".
You will also find numerous articles there (I link to subject page …
- 5,968