Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with causality
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 5154
0
votes
First-cause theory and simulation universe
This 'everything' you speak of only 'exists' because there are living beings here to perceive it. As Camus put it in The Fall: "Is it not universal obliteration, everlasting nothingness made visible? …
- 7,650
1
vote
Is it correct to refute that what exists has a cause?
[cause A for the existence of causality] does not exist.
Being (as nothing), does not exist.
3. There is a cause for the existence of causality. … Being is the ground of beings and hence causality.
8.Statement 7 contradicts statement 3.
No contradiction. …
- 7,650
3
votes
Accepted
Does the essentially Western concept of causality form a philosophical dialectic with the Ju...
Synchronicity or mysticism is hardly mentioned in respectable philosophy. A recent mention in psychology (quoted below) throws some light, and Stanislav Grof writes interestingly about it. Synchroni …
- 7,650
1
vote
Is there any principle that requires only things that begin to exist have a cause?
OP: "if the first cause is by definition uncaused, what possible principle could serve to differentiate between these two kinds of first causes?"
This can be explained from a phenomenological point of …
- 7,650
2
votes
cause “for which all causal relations exist”
Causal relations apply to things, for example: there is a ruler on my desk because I put it there. Cause and reason are synonymous: the reason for the ruler being there is that I put it there.
The pr …
- 7,650
0
votes
Does phenomenology reject causality, in that there are natural laws to be understood and uti...
(Page 124)
Heidegger likens the Principle of causality, or Principle of reason, to an aspect or dimension of Being, but the capability of language is pushed to describe their deep interoperation. … (Page 129)
So no, at least this phenomenologist does not reject causality. …
- 7,650
1
vote
Presentism and simultaneity
The OP writes:
So I can talk about now - in this room, ...
But for distant places, which will be moving in some way [relative] to
where I am here now, the concept of simultaneity fails?
…
- 7,650
1
vote
Must time flow?
My tuppenceworth: A second is defined according to the natural resonance frequency of the cesium atom (9,192,631,770 Hz), so scientific time is Aristotelian, based on motion. However, in a higher gra …
- 7,650
0
votes
is there any inconsistancy if i claim thing-in-itselmselves are giving our mind "causality"?
OP: can't we just say, thing-in-itself gives us "causality" in our mind, because "causality" is a property of thing-in-itself, itself? … It is slightly more specific than Heidegger's clearing but its relation to ratio/causality is quite similar. …
- 7,650
2
votes
a Solution to The Problem Of Casuality and Thing-in-Themselves (Problem of Affection)
I think you're right. Let's say something bumps your hand in the dark. The sensation is processed unconsciously, so a priori as far as conscious apperception is concerned. You already have the idea t …
- 7,650
2
votes
ls it true about causality?
"In short, the principle of causality implies the existence of entities that exist but have no effects"
First of all, nothing cannot be an entity. …
- 7,650