Questions tagged [reductionism]
The reductionism tag has no usage guidance.
62 questions
11
votes
3
answers
3k
views
What made scientists think that chemistry is reducible to physics and when did that happen?
What I mean by reduction in this context is the following: suppose you are analyzing a simple event like one object striking another in space. At the macroscopic level one, you can describe this event ...
0
votes
0
answers
46
views
Modulo grounding, is it usually presupposed that every possible world has the same number of "levels" of emergence/reduction?
Following Fine(?)[??], pg. 6 (but then not quite the whole document):
The history of analytic philosophy is littered with attempts to explain the special way in which one might attempt to ‘reduce' ...
2
votes
0
answers
89
views
Challenging the distinction between a validity and a tautology
I know that there is a formal difference between a validity and a tautology. On the one hand, a validity is any formula of First-Order Logic that is true in all interpretations. A tautology is a ...
5
votes
4
answers
933
views
Mechanistic view of the universe
I was chatgpting and found Encouragement of the Mechanistic View The mechanistic view in physics is driven by several key principles:
Determinism: The idea that the future behavior of a system can be ...
4
votes
1
answer
203
views
Understanding Dennett's Philosophy of Mind
Daniel Dennett was a reductionist; he argued that the mind is entirely physical and can be reduced to the physical world. In one his lectures, he spoke about the colors on the American flag and ...
-1
votes
1
answer
101
views
Do combinations defy logic? [closed]
At computers base they view everything through a lense of true (1) or false (0). Computers are the best logical machines we have created because of this but because of this a computer doesnt know what ...
2
votes
2
answers
146
views
How do reductionist physicalist perceive social sciences?
For the reductionist naturalists, only physical sciences can describe reality (Shook 2011, 5):
Other kinds of naturalism do not agree with reductionist universalism and feel comfortable with ...
4
votes
0
answers
55
views
Is emergent property basically a subsystem?
I've been thinking about the relationships between systems, subsystems, and emergent properties, and I would appreciate your insights on this concept.
My notion is that subsystems can be viewed not ...
2
votes
3
answers
247
views
Under reductive materialism, could the same brain state evoke distinct conscious experiences (qualia) in two universes within a multiverse?
For the sake of discussion, let's grant the validity of reductive materialism. Moreover, let's entertain the notion that our universe is just one among an infinite (or significantly vast) number of ...
3
votes
5
answers
181
views
Reductionism from a philosophical viewpoint
Reductionism is the idea that knowledge at a higher level can be deduced from the entities and their interaction at a lower level. E.g. the claim that the properties of molecules can be deduced from ...
1
vote
2
answers
105
views
Do we breakdown an explanation of the world into reductionism and holism?
We breakdown the world with an explanation of the truth, in having two schools of approach, the reductionist approach and the holistic approach.
Is there another approach?
Will both approaches arrive ...
3
votes
1
answer
197
views
What's the difference between supervenience and reduction?
From IEP, supervenience is defined as follows: F, supervenes on a class of properties, G, just in case there is no difference in F-properties without some difference in G-properties.
My question is, ...
1
vote
7
answers
2k
views
Are we lost in the details?
A hypothesis.
https://theworld.org/stories/2021-05-20/imagining-gaia-earth-one-great-living-organism
Simply put, the Gaia hypothesis says that Earth is a living system and uses similar mechanisms that ...
0
votes
3
answers
163
views
Physics and the question of context or environment
This is a reality check type of question. I am interested in whether it's a valid distinction and whether it's been considered by others.
It occured to me the other day that the issue of 'context' or '...
1
vote
4
answers
219
views
Topdown bottom up reductionism emergentism
My question is how reductionism and emergentism/holistic related/same as to top-down bottom-up approach ? Please give me reference if possible
Certainly, here's a table with 10 examples from various ...
2
votes
4
answers
385
views
Are the concepts of reductionism and first principles the same?
Are reductionism and foundationalism(first principle)the same thing, or at least highly similar even if different? The first-principles approach is the same as deducing all knowledge claims from ...
2
votes
2
answers
186
views
On thermodynamics being fundamental?
Are there philosophers who argue that thermodynamics (where time does have a direction) is the more fundamental theory as opposed to normal Newtonian mechanics and it's extensions?
For example, I can ...
4
votes
3
answers
380
views
Under metaphysical naturalism, does everything boil down to Physics?
If metaphysical naturalism is true, would that mean that Physics is the ultimate discipline that can sufficiently explain everything, and that all other disciplines, including Chemistry, Biology, ...
2
votes
2
answers
139
views
Why did phenomenalism fall out of favour in analytic philosophy?
Modern analytic philosophy proposes various reductionist projects to reduce phenomenal terms (like redness e.t.c) into physical terms (like neural-states, functional states e.t.c) such as for example, ...
2
votes
1
answer
192
views
Who has defended a non-causal (emanationist) concept of strong emergence, compatible with reductionism?
Often in debates about emergence, an opposition is set up between (strong) emergence and reductionism. These are seen as incompatible alternatives.
In particular, if one believes in downward causation,...
4
votes
4
answers
179
views
Hard stuff made easy?
There is a philosophical assumption, inspired by educational didactics, which consists of thinking that any concept, no matter how intricate, can be presented in simple words and easily understood if ...
4
votes
3
answers
233
views
Non-random indeterminism in physicalist reductionism?
In lectures on free will, often a dichotomy between determinism and random is alluded. This dichotomy always is not a true dichotomy, there are some known and even trivial examples of non-random ...
9
votes
3
answers
801
views
What are the missing pieces that prevents us from deriving the laws of chemistry from physics?
What are the missing pieces that prevents us from deriving the laws of chemistry from physics? People say it's emergent properties, but it's hard to believe that there are emergent properties between ...
2
votes
1
answer
90
views
Does rejecting reductionism absolutely imply that you accept the existence of emergent properties?
Does rejecting reductionism absolutely imply that you accept the existence of emergent properties? Or is there an alternative explanation to emergent properties? By reductionism, I mean the belief ...
1
vote
2
answers
191
views
References for books/papers about emergentism and reductionism
I am trying to look for resources to deepen some topics presented in this workshop Moving Naturalism Forward. Especially the point on emergence (and secondarily on evolution and determinism, but here ...
1
vote
1
answer
156
views
What does "reductionism does not imply constructionism" mean?
In their famous 1976 paper, Marr and Poggio start out by saying:
Complex systems, like a nervous system or a developing embryo, must be analyzed and understood at several different levels. Of course, ...
1
vote
2
answers
170
views
What is it called when two theories ultimately become one theory in science?
I am trying to think of an example of scientific explanation whose scope was in fact broader than we initially thought. The idea would be the following:
Initially, we used H (the explanation) to ...
1
vote
3
answers
130
views
Are there examples of the narrowing scope of scientific explanations?
I am trying to think of an example of scientific explanation whose scope was in fact more limited than we initially thought. The idea would be the following:
Initially, we used H (the explanation) to ...
2
votes
1
answer
1k
views
What are some examples of things that are ontologically parasitic
To be ontologically parasitic, a thing must exist only in reference to another thing.
For example, in the excellent video "How Many Holes Does a Human Have?", holes are identified as ontologically ...
1
vote
0
answers
37
views
Are there any scholarly books on the topic of “reductionism”?
By “reductionism” I mean a general tendency for people to make false assertions, inferences or extrapolations because they assume some situation is based on certain mechanisms or can be modeled in a ...
1
vote
4
answers
240
views
Does good chess strategy reduce to the rules of the game?
I've been trying to understand what is meant by words like reduction and reductionism in different contexts. Being somewhat scientifically minded, I enthusiastically embrace reduction as a strategy ...
2
votes
2
answers
539
views
Which kind of physics does everything reduce to?
I don't know whether the proper term is Physicalism or Physical Reductionism (it's Reductive Physicalism--thank you, Conifold), but what I'm referring to is the position that everything reduces to ...
0
votes
0
answers
62
views
This is a question of ethics
Few thousand years ago two Indian schools carvakas and Ajivikas challenged Karma doctrine , as there was no good or bad deeds and no reward or punishment , Is there any Western thought similar to this ...
3
votes
1
answer
781
views
How can complex material systems emerge in ways that allow them to transcend fundamental material structures?
One of the quandaries of reductionism from what I understand is how complex systems can emerge to overtake simple ones. This may sound convoluted, so bear with me as I try to explain.
According to a ...
1
vote
0
answers
57
views
What is Quine’s reductionism?
I am especially interested in how reductionism is related to the fact that even though science broadly comprehends a number of subjects, physics is paradigmatic.
1
vote
0
answers
57
views
Can reductive explanation transcend human understanding?
This is more of a terminology question regarding the definition of reductive explanation. Suppose that it turned out there is a reductive explanation for consciousness to the physical, but the ...
1
vote
2
answers
352
views
Is emergentism incompatible with reductionism?
I've read, on several occasions, that emergentism is maybe not all the way contrasted but at least to some degree conflicted with reductionism. As I understand, emergentism is a doctrine within ...
1
vote
4
answers
1k
views
Does it make sense to say that consciousness does not exist or there is no such thing?
Does it make sense to say that consciousness does not exist or there is no such thing? I've not taken any classes in reductionism, but it seems reductionst.
How would philosophy of mind and ...
4
votes
0
answers
239
views
Is the study of IQ an example of greedy reductionism?
Is the study of IQ an example of greedy reductionism?
greedy reductionism occurs when "in their eagerness for a bargain, in
their zeal to explain too much too fast, scientists and philosophers
....
6
votes
3
answers
279
views
How does one judge the "complexity" of a given assumption (for the purpose of producing the “best explanation")?
In philosophy and science, we may wish to argue that some hypothesis 'explains' some facts we observe. In which case, we may lay out some assumptions for our hypothesis, in order to show how these ...
5
votes
4
answers
322
views
Is the concept of emergence sufficient in blocking reductionism?
Is emergence the only avenue to follow in order to successfully short-cirquit full reductionist explanations?
What other recourse does one have to avoid full-fledged reductionism without risking ...
7
votes
8
answers
643
views
Is reductionism in conflict with our sense of awe and wonder?
To accuse science of robbing life of the warmth that makes it worth living is so preposterously mistaken, so diametrically opposite to my own feelings and those of most working scientists, I am almost ...
3
votes
5
answers
583
views
Is Antireductionism a scientific position?
I read in Wikipedia:
Antireductionism is a philosophical and scientific position that ...
It seems to me that Antireductionism cannot be a scientific position as it is in direct conflict with ...
0
votes
3
answers
244
views
Is philosophy computation?
If philosophy is mathematics and mathematics is computation, can I conclude that philosophy is computation? Can we axiomatize philosophy? Can a computer think for us, given the current rise of AI?
I'...
1
vote
4
answers
108
views
Are we "realists" about something we think reduces to something mind dependent?
Are we "realists" about something we think reduces to something mind dependent? I assumed not, due to reduction meaning that there is only that reduced to thing.
If you read this article, when moral ...
4
votes
1
answer
273
views
Reductionism and Parmenides
Though I thought about it multiple times, I never understood Parmenides' argument for the impossibility of change. Now studying Aristotle's Physics, it popped up again and I still have the same ...
3
votes
2
answers
630
views
If a physical property is emergent, can it still be artificially recreated?
Let's assume that a physical property is emergent, in the sense that it cannot be reduced to a function of the properties of its components. Can such a property be artificially recreated, or is that a ...
8
votes
5
answers
3k
views
What are the problems with reductionism?
It seems intuitive to me to think that if there is a basic substance or building block of nature (e.g. fermions and leptons, etc.), then all facts regarding entities comprised of that substance are ...
2
votes
3
answers
139
views
Nonreductionist supervenience
I'm currently reading Kim's The Mind-Body Problem after Fifty Years which tries to summarise how the MB problem has evolved and been approached the past few decades.
One of the very important terms ...
7
votes
1
answer
865
views
What are the relations between supervenience, grounding and emergence in philosophy of science?
So, I am wondering if anyone could help me with the notions of grounding (supervenience?) and emergence in the modern discussions in philosophy of science. What are they and what is the relation ...